2/27/2024 0 Comments Analysis oversight facebookThis highlights the Board’s previous concerns on cross-check, including around transparency and unequal treatment of users. In the Hostages Kidnapped From Israel case, Meta initially only let accounts on its cross-check lists share October 7 hostage-taking content. This may have been exacerbated by Meta’s crisis response of lowering the removal threshold for content under the Violent and Graphic Content policy following the October 7 attacks. Both the removal of the post and the rejection of the user’s appeal happened automatically, without human review. The Al-Shifa Hospital case also shows that insufficient human oversight of automated moderation during crisis response can lead to the incorrect removal of speech that may be of significant public interest. While this reduced the likelihood that Meta would fail to remove violating content that might otherwise evade detection or where capacity for human review was limited, it also increased the likelihood of Meta mistakenly removing non-violating content related to the conflict. This meant that Meta used its automated tools more aggressively to remove content that might violate its policies. These measures applied to content originating in Israel and Gaza. The Board’s decisions discussed a number of aspects of Meta’s performance during the crisis that affected free expression.įollowing an exceptional surge in violent and graphic content after the October 7 attacks, Meta temporarily lowered thresholds for automated tools to detect and remove potentially violating content. The other case involves a video on Instagram showing the aftermath of a strike on or near Al-Shifa Hospital in Gaza City. One case concerns a video on Facebook of an Israeli woman begging her kidnappers not to kill her as she is taken hostage on October 7. In each case, the Board overturned Meta’s original decision to remove the content but approved its subsequent decision to restore the post with a warning screen. Today, the Board published its first expedited decisions in two cases about the #IsraelHamas conflict. Oversight Board publishes first Summary Decisions #OversightBoard #AmilcarCabral #Peru #Women #Facebook You can read summaries of the three decisions here ↓ After the Board brought this case to Meta's attention, it removed the post. The third case relates to Meta's decision to leave up a post that attacked an identifiable woman and compared her to a motor vehicle (a "truck") despite violating its rules on Bullying and Harassment.Meta determined the removal was incorrect after the Board brought it to its attention. In the second case, Meta restored a post that compared hanging Peru's ex-President Castillo to Mussolini's execution after initially removing it under its Violence and Incitement policy.After the Board brought the case to Meta’s attention, the company determined the removal was incorrect and restored it. The first case concerns Meta’s removal of a post praising anti-colonial leader Amílcar Cabral for violating its Dangerous Organizations and Individuals policy. These examine content where Meta reversed its initial decision once the Board brought the case to its attention. Today we are issuing three summary decisions on content involving praise for Amílcar Cabral, dehumanizing speech against a woman and a statement about Peru's ex-president.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |